Are Upsets Likely?

I have done some research from 2006 to 2011 about how often an upset happens. I took every game in which a Power conference team (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, Pac-10/12, and Big East) played against a mid-major team (or non-Power conference team) and I found some pretty results. Take a look at what I found!

Since 2006, Power conference schools have a 149-58 record against mid-major schools (72% winning pctg).

In the first round in 2006, Power conference schools had a record of 20-6. The highest seeds to lose that year were Iowa (#3), Arkansas (#8), Kansas (#4), Oklahoma (#6), and Michigan State (#6) (Seton Hall also lost but they were a 10-seed). In the second round, Power conference schools went 4-4. North Carolina (#3), Tennessee (#2), Pittsburgh (#5) all lost to lower seeds. Indiana lost as well but they were the lower seed in their matchup. In the third round, they had a record of 2-0, followed by fourth round record of 1-1, when George Mason upset #1 seed Connecticut. In the fifth round, the Power conference schools went 1-0 when Florida beat George Mason in the Final Four.

In 2007, Power conferences had a first round record of 17-3. The highest seeds that lost that year were: Notre Dame (#6) and Duke (#6).Georgia Tech lost as well but they were the lower-seeded team. In the second round, they had a record of 3-3. UNLV knocked off #2 seeded Wisconsin and Butler beat #4 Maryland, (Southern Illinois beat Virginia Tech, but was the higher-seeded team). In the third round they went 1-1, Memphis beat Texas A&M (Memphis was the higher seed). All mid-major schools were eliminated in the Elite Eight (Memphis lost to Ohio State).

In 2008, they posted a first round record of 17-2. Vanderbilt (#4) and Georgia (#14) lost in the first round. They went 3-3 in the second round. Purdue (#6) lost to higher seeded (#3) Xavier, (#8) Mississippi State lost to #1 Memphis, and #10 Davidson beat #2 Georgetown.  In the third round they went 1-3, losing #3 Wisconsin to Davidson, #5 Michigan State to Memphis, and #7 West Virginia to Xavier. They rebounded in the fourth round to go 2-1, only losing to #2 Texas to Memphis. Memphis wound up losing to Kansas in the national title game.

In 2009, the Power conference dominated the mid-majors. They posted a 18-4 record in the first round, losing only #8 Ohio State, #4 Wake Forest, #6 West Virginia, and #5 Illinois. Then, they went 3-2 in the second round, losing #12 Wisconsin to #4 Xavier and #10 Maryland to #2 Memphis. By the time the third round ended, all the mid-majors were eliminated.

In 2010, some of the “power” started to shift. The Power schools went 16-6 in the first round, losing #3 Georgetown, #9 Florida State, #11 Minnesota, #3 Vanderbilt, #10 Florida, and #6 Notre Dame. In the second round, they went 5-4 and lost #2 Villanova, #4 Wisconsin, #3 Pittsburgh, and #1 Kansas. They rebounded, going 4-1 in the fourth round only losing #1 Syracuse. In the next two rounds, #2 Kansas State and #5 Michigan State were knocked off by #5 Butler. Butler wound up losing to #1 Duke in the national championship.

Finally, last year Power schools went 18-6 in the first round. They lost #9 Villanova, #10 Penn State, #5 Vanderbilt, #4 Louisville, #6 Georgetown, and #6 St. Johns. They went 0-2 in the second round losing #1 Pittsburgh and #3 Purdue. In the third round they had a record of 3-2 with #4 Wisconsin and #10 Florida State losing. They followed that by going 0-2 in the fourth round when they lost #1 Kansas and #2 Florida. In the Final Four, Butler beat the other mid-major VCU. Butler wound up losing the championship to Power school Connecticut.

So how likely are first round upsets? Or how likely are mid-majors to upset a Power conference school in the first round?

Over the past six years, Power conference schools have won 86 of the 113 games played. That comes out to a 76% winning percentage over six years of data. Power conference schools have won 18 of 34 games in the second round (winning 53%). In the third round, their winning percentage jumps back up to 69.5% (16-7). For some reason they take the Elite Eight weekend off, posting a 4-5 record (44%). In the Final Four, they are 1-3 and in the championship game 3-0.

So are upsets likely in the first round? I classify an upset as a team beating another team who is seeded at least 5 seeds higher. In the first round, there is a possibility of 24 upsets because you can go through seeds 1-6 before you and still be 5 seeds higher than your opponent.

So in 2006, there were four teams that lost to teams seeded five or more seeds below them (4 out of 24= 16.67%).

In 2007, there were two upsets (2 out of 24=8.33%).

In 2008, there was only one upset (1 out of 24=4.167%).

In 2009, there were three upsets (3 out of 24=12.5%).

In 2010, there were three again (3 out of 24=12.5%).

And in 2011, four upsets took place (4 out of 24=16.67%).

When you add all the numbers together, out of a possible 144 upsets, only 17 upsets actually happened. 17-144 is a 11.8% (or 12% if you’re a glass half-full type person) that an upset will occur. Although the numbers are so low, the past three years the percentages are up to 13.8% and the last two years 14.5%.

So if you take a look at this year’s bracket, who do you like? Keep in mind, that seeds 4, 5, 6 are the most common seeds that get beat in the first round. The #6 seed has accounted for 53% of all upsets that have taken place in the first round since 2006 (9 out of 17). And out of the possible 24 6 v. 11 games that have been played since 2006, the 11th seed has a 37.5% chance of winning.

When I look at the bracket this year, no Power conference teams play mid-majors in the 6 v. 11 game, so let’s move on.

The #5 seed has been included in 2 of the 17 upsets (or 12%). Vanderbilt plays Harvard in the only 5-12 game in which a Power conference school is the highest seed. Although the 12-seed has only won 2 out of a possible 24 games against the 5-seed since 2006, Vanderbilt lost as a 5-seed last season.

Onto the 4 v. 13 matchup where Louisville plays Davidson, Michigan plays Ohio, Indiana plays VCU, and Wisconsin plays Montana. 4-seeds have lost 4 out 24 games in the first round since 2006. But of the possible upsets, a 13 beating a 4 is the second most likely (23.5%). People are saying that Ohio can beat Michigan and Montana can beat Wisconsin. Picking one of those games wouldn’t be a bad idea.

That’s all I have for now. I will write later about who I think can pull off an upset. In the meantime, enjoy this!


One thought on “Are Upsets Likely?

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s